CIMdata PLM Industry Summary Online Archive

24 March 2011

Company News

Research Reveals the Business Value of Managed Content—30 Percent Productivity Gains, 25 Percent in Efficiency Improvements

A new research report co-sponsored by AIIM, the enterprise content management (ECM) organization, and OpenText™ provides real, quantifiable insight into how better strategies around the management of information and content can help companies operate more profitably and capitalize on the positive benefits from knowledge sharing, collaboration and business process improvement.

One of the more notable findings from the survey of more than 450 information technology professionals and business managers is that the productivity of professional staff would be improved by 30 percent if they could only find internal information and documents as quickly and as easily as they find information on the Web. Along the same lines, respondents said customer service levels and response times could be improved by 33 percent if all customer-facing staff could immediately access and share all customer-related and case-related information.

"In all businesses, content is growing rapidly. We know that productivity, compliance and business responsiveness will steadily decline if nothing is done to manage this content deluge," said Doug Miles, Director of the AIIM Market Intelligence Division, and author of Capitalizing on Content: A Compelling ROI for Change, a white paper on the survey results. "In this report, we measured ROI factors closely, quantifying the improvements that a well-implemented ECM system can provide, and indicating the potential costs of compliance and security lapses. The opportunities for business improvement are remarkably significant."

Adding to its credibility, the report compares the expectations of potential improvement from those respondents whose companies have yet to invest in ECM against the actual experiences of those who currently have such systems in use. Areas explored for improvement included productivity, customer service, collaboration and storage, among others.

Additional opportunities for improvement included:

The productivity of administrative staff could be increased on average by 33 percent through use of workflow, scanned forms and automated data capture.

Changing to a culture of electronic-only filing would reduce the office space allocated to filing storage from 14.5 percent to 5.9 percent - a 60 percent reduction.

The size of server farms dedicated to unstructured content and emails could be reduced by between a third and a half if each document or email attachment was stored only once.

A collaborative, widely accessible team-site environment could improve project delivery by 23 percent on average in terms of time and project costs.

Respondents indicated they believe that Enterprise 2.0 applications could improve staff productivity and engagement by about 18 percent.

The improved efficiency from providing office staff with comprehensive mobile access to company information would likely be between 20 percent and 25 percent.

While the survey indicates a compelling case for adopting ECM technologies, it also exposes the significant challenges for companies that get overwhelmed by the sheer volume of documents and content accumulating on shared drives, email, laptops and mobile device and paper files.

According to 61 percent of the survey respondents, organizational knowledge is the first thing to suffer in a badly managed environment, causing the organization to lose its competitive position due to poor decisions and a lack of accumulated corporate expertise. Innovation is considered to be another significant victim of poor collaboration and restricted knowledge-sharing, followed by the productivity impact of information search fatigue.

Compliance breaches and information and data leaks also weighed heavily on the minds of the survey respondents. For instance 40 percent of organizations would take a financial hit from a compliance breach while fully 66 percent would suffer bad - and costly - publicity. Over a third of organizations reported they would have no way of finding out who was responsible if sensitive data was "leaked" to a competitor or to the press by a trusted employee. Only a quarter could readily point to a specific employee based on activity logs. For 60 percent of the largest organizations, the potential impact of such a leak would be high, and for 13 percent it would be "disastrous."

This study is available as part of the OpenText Though Leadership Series. For more information, go to: http://www.opentext.com/2/global/innovate-domorewithyourcontent or listen to an OpenText News Podcast about the study featuring Doug Miles and James Latham.

Become a member of the CIMdata PLM Community to receive your daily PLM news and much more.

Tell us what you think of the CIMdata Newsletter. Send your feedback.

CIMdata is committed to your privacy. Your personal information will never be sold or shared outside of CIMdata without your express permission.

Subscribe